One Plan for Selling Your Medical or Dental Practice

For most physicians and dentists, the practice sale is the largest financial event they will ever face, and the retirement plan they never formally built.

Most practice owners recognize the signs: clinical fatigue that no longer lifts after a vacation, revenue that has plateaued for two or three years, or a serious buyer whose offer finally makes the math look real. Those signs tell you the timing may be right. They say nothing about whether the retirement-income plan is ready to absorb a large, one-time influx of capital.

According to IBBA data, practice and business sales routinely take longer to close than sellers expect, and transaction multiples vary substantially based on how well the seller prepared for due diligence, tax structuring, and buyer qualification. The takeaway is plain: you do not optimize a practice sale in the final quarter before retirement. You structure it over time, with the tax election, the retirement-account drawdown schedule, and the post-close income plan all running in parallel.

The advisors most sellers already have handle the closing-day picture reasonably well. CPAs minimize the closing-day tax bill. Brokers maximize the sale price. At Modern Wealth, the work I do with practice sellers starts where both of those conversations tend to end: what do you actually live on once the proceeds land?

Why Is Selling Your Practice Really a Retirement-Income Problem?

For most physicians and dentists, the practice is the largest asset they own. When it closes, the monthly income stops. Everything else follows from that.

I work with business owners across a lot of industries, and the practice-seller situation is genuinely different. A software founder usually has a diversified investment portfolio alongside the company. A dentist or physician who poured 20 or 30 years into building a practice often does not. The practice is the retirement plan. It was always going to be the retirement plan. And that creates a very specific set of problems the day someone makes a serious offer.

An analysis of more than a dozen advisory and peer sources on practice sales shows that most content addresses only one part of the exit: brokers focus on sale price, accountants focus on the closing-day tax bill, and dentist-community discussions focus on whether to sell to a DSO or a private buyer. Almost nothing addresses the question that actually matters most: what does the seller live on once the proceeds land, and for how long?

According to data from IBBA research cited by M&A advisors, 75 to 90 percent of businesses that go to market never sell. That statistic belongs to every industry, not just healthcare. The takeaway for practice owners is uncomfortable: a sale is not guaranteed, so building a plan around "when I sell" without accounting for the possibility of a delayed or restructured exit is a meaningful risk.

I think of the practice-sale planning problem in terms of what I call the income sequencing test: before you sign anything, can you answer three questions? First, what does the net after-tax proceeds number actually look like, not the gross sale price? Second, how long before those proceeds, placed in a diversified investment portfolio, produce a reliable monthly income? Third, what do you live on in the gap between closing day and that point?

Most sellers I work with have a confident answer to the first question. Almost none have thought carefully about the second and third. That is where plans fall apart, not at the negotiating table.

The reality is that the practice sale is not a wealth event that solves everything downstream. It is the starting point of a retirement-income plan. The sale price, the tax structure, and the account drawdown order are three decisions that interact with each other, and a change to any one of them changes the math on the others. In my experience working with business owners and entrepreneurs, the professionals who come out ahead are the ones who treat those three decisions as a single coordinated plan rather than three separate conversations with three separate advisors.

Modern Wealth is an independent, fee-only fiduciary firm built specifically around this kind of integrated work. The point is not to replace your broker or your CPA. The point is to make sure someone is running the integrated model before you sign, not six months after.

Who Actually Needs to Be in the Room When You Sell a Practice?

A broker, an attorney, a CPA, and a financial advisor. That is the standard answer, and it is mostly right.

According to the American Dental Association, assembling a multi-professional team is one of the first steps in a practice sale: someone to value the practice, an attorney experienced in dental transactions, a certified accountant familiar with healthcare, and a financial advisor. What the ADA guidance does not explain, and where I think most practice owners get stuck, is what each of those four people is actually responsible for. They are not doing the same work. They are not interchangeable. And when one role is missing or left to someone else to cover, there is a real cost.

The broker's job is to get the highest sale price. Full stop. A good broker runs a competitive process, manages confidentiality, and keeps buyers engaged. That is genuinely valuable work, and I would not try to talk a practice owner out of using one. But the broker is not modeling what the sale proceeds produce in retirement. That is not their job.

The CPA's job is to structure the transaction in a way that reduces the tax at closing. That is also valuable, and also incomplete. A CPA who focuses only on the closing-day tax bill may not account for how the installment-sale election interacts with your retirement account drawdown in years two and three.

The financial advisor, as I think of the role, is the one who runs the model that connects all three decisions. A fee-only fiduciary approach works here specifically because there is no product sale motivating the recommendation. The goal is a coherent plan: what the proceeds look like after tax, how long they need to last, what income they can support, and in what order to draw from each account type. Modern Wealth's work spans financial planning, retirement income, and business advisory precisely because those three areas do not stay in separate boxes when a professional is selling their practice.

The tension worth naming is this: the four-person team is only as effective as the communication between them. In my experience, brokers and CPAs often work in parallel rather than in sequence. The financial advisor, if engaged early enough, can make sure the tax election the CPA is optimizing for the closing day does not create a bigger problem in year two of retirement. That coordination takes work. It is also the most commonly skipped part of the whole process.

Eight distinct planning areas intersect in a practice sale: retirement, investment, cash flow, risk, estate, tax, education, and business advisory. Most sellers encounter maybe three of those during the transaction. The other five show up later, often as surprises.

How Do You Know It's Actually the Right Time to Sell?

Timing involves market conditions, personal readiness, and retirement-income math. Most sellers focus only on market conditions. The other two determine whether the plan actually works.

According to dental practice advisory guidance, the five signals that typically precede a practice sale are persistent clinical fatigue, a revenue plateau the owner cannot break through, the arrival of a serious buyer with credible financing, a health event, and a meaningful shift in the competitive environment. Those signals are real and worth tracking. None of them tells you whether the retirement-income math is ready for the proceeds to land.

Market timing has its own rhythm, and it has been moving. According to Group Dentistry Now, 2025 was widely characterized as a drought year for dental practice transactions, with DSO acquisition activity pulling back from the pace of prior years. That cycle appears to be reversing. Roughly 69 percent of Dental Support Organizations report plans for more acquisitions in the near term, and 78 percent face a recapitalization event within the next 12 to 36 months. For a seller timing an exit, a more active buyer market means more options to negotiate a deal structure that serves the income plan, not just the headline price.

There is also a valuation-timing risk that cuts the other way. Practices that have reached a revenue plateau often see multiples soften over the following 24 to 36 months as buyers shift their attention to higher-growth targets. Waiting for the market to improve while revenue stays flat is not a reliable strategy. The sellers who realize this early enough to act are the ones who have been watching the income-sequencing math, not just the market calendar.

The distinction I come back to with practice-seller clients is between readiness to sell and readiness for retirement. A dentist who has reached clinical burnout and found a willing buyer is ready to sell. Whether they are ready for retirement depends on what the net after-tax proceeds will produce in income, how long before that income becomes reliable, and what covers expenses in the gap. Most sellers I work with have a confident answer to the first question. Very few have stress-tested the second and third.

Running the income-sequencing model starts with the net after-tax proceeds number, which is almost never the same as the sale price. Then it asks: placed in a diversified portfolio, how long before those proceeds generate a predictable monthly draw? For most retiring practitioners, the honest answer falls somewhere between one and three years of portfolio exposure. The gap in between is the problem to plan around.

In practice, a 12 to 18-month runway before the expected close gives enough time to model the income floor, evaluate the installment-sale election against the retirement account drawdown schedule, and close any gaps before they become closing-table surprises. A 90-day runway gives almost none of that.

The five classic sale-readiness signals tell you the decision is near. What they do not tell you is whether the income plan can absorb the timing of a real-world close. That question is worth asking first, not last.

What Will Shape Practice Sale Outcomes in the Next Two Years?

For practice sellers, buyer competition looks set to strengthen through 2027. How much of the sale price a seller actually keeps will depend on deal structure and tax sequencing, not the headline multiple.

The buyer market for dental and medical practices, which many industry observers described as unusually quiet in 2025, is showing signals of a rebound. According to Becker's Dental Review, more than 200 DSO affiliations and over 35 active private-equity-backed acquirers were tracked in 2025, a year many characterized as a trough period. The pipeline heading into 2026 and 2027 appears wider, with a significant share of existing DSO platforms facing recapitalization events that will require them to add scale. For a seller, a more active buyer market is not uncomplicated good news: more bidders typically mean better initial offers, but also more pressure to close quickly on terms the buyer prefers rather than terms the seller's income plan requires.

The signal I track most closely from an advisory standpoint is not buyer activity, which is largely outside a seller's control. It is the deal-structure variable, which is not. In a practice sale, the asset allocation in the purchase agreement and the payment structure are negotiated before signing. A financial advisor engaged before the offer stage can model both. One engaged after has limited ability to change either.

The part most sellers miss is the timing pressure. A hot buyer market increases urgency to close, and speed is structurally a buyer advantage. A practice seller who has not worked through the income-sequencing plan before an offer arrives may accept a deal that looks strong on the headline price, then discover that the tax structure and the gap between closing day and a reliable retirement-income floor have quietly cost more than any improvement in negotiated multiple would have recovered. Preparation is the one part of this equation the seller controls entirely.

The practice sale is the clearest version of a problem I see with all business exits: the biggest financial event of someone's career gets treated as a transaction instead of a plan. The broker closes the deal. The CPA files the return. No one models what the proceeds actually produce in monthly income, or how the account drawdown order interacts with the tax on the installment note in year two.

The sellers who come through this well started the income-sequencing conversation before the deal was signed. According to IBBA data, prepared sellers navigate due diligence more smoothly and leave fewer dollars behind. The tax election, the retirement-account drawdown order, and the post-close income floor are not details to sort out after closing. They interact directly with the deal structure itself, and changing them after the purchase agreement is signed is considerably harder than building them in before.

The plan is not complicated. It is just less common than it should be, which is exactly why the gap exists and why this conversation is worth having early.

← All articles